Dropping the Ball

Sorry for dropping the ball on the LC'05 conference reporting. Day 5 was when I had my talk, so it was a little hectic, and then after my talk they had already turned off the wireless ethernet and locked the computer lab. Now, of course, I don't remember what happened. Oh well.

Thank you, Greg!

Greg Restall is way more dedicated and wired than I am. He already has two posts about what's happening at the Logic Colloquium, and I just made it up the hill in the midday sun. I am so glad I didn't pack my computer. So thank you, Greg, for blogging from the Logic Colloquium, so … Continue reading Thank you, Greg!

More on Gödel in the Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Wow, it's just raining Gödel references. The latest issue of the Bulletin of Symbolic Logic is all about Gödel, with exciting-sounding titles like "Future tasks for Gödel scholars" (John W. Dawson, Jr. and Cheryl A. Dawson), "On Gödel's way in: the influence of Rudolf Carnap" (Warren Goldfarb), and "Gödel's reformulation of Gentzen's first consistency proof … Continue reading More on Gödel in the Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Gödel and Leibniz

I'm re-reading Coffa's The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap in preparation for my course on the Vienna Circle, and was struck by this quote on p. 14: With his characteristic blend of genius and insanity, Leibniz had conceived of a project in which the simple constituents of concepts would be represented by prime numbers … Continue reading Gödel and Leibniz

Jetlag

Well, I spent the last 2 weeks finishing a paper and cleaning house, and now I'm in Vienna and jetlagged. But I got all my library cards in order and checked out some books. Now all I need is some sleep, setting up some kind of internet access at home, and I'll be back to … Continue reading Jetlag

Kurt Gödel, paper on the incompleteness theorems (1931)

Source

Ivor Grattan-Guinness, ed., Landmark Writings in Mathematics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2004), 917–925

Abstract

This entry for the Landmark Writings in Mathematics collection discusses Kurt Gödel's 1931 paper on the incompleteness theorems, with a special emphasis on the historical and philosophical context.

Exact Philosophy

The Society for Exact Philosophy is meeting in Toronto right now. (Someone told me that the name of the society is a joke, but maybe they were joking. It's serious philosophy, in any event. And it's the 33rd annual conference, so if it's a joke, it's a long-running joke.) The keynote speakers are Jason Stanley, … Continue reading Exact Philosophy